I won’t hide the ball; I’ll just tell you the answer: Federal district courts deciding motions to dismiss an antitrust case too often apply the summary-judgment standard to conspiracy allegations, particularly when confronted with non-parallel-conduct cases. This isn’t scientific or empirical—it is my observation and is enough of an issue…
The Antitrust Attorney Blog
Active Supervision and State Action Immunity for Licensing Boards Controlled by Market Participants
In early 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC that the “active state supervision” prong of the state-action immunity from antitrust liability test applied to state licensing boards controlled by market participants. You can read my analysis of the decision here.…
Section 5 of the FTC Act and Commissioner Joshua Wright: Mission Accomplished?
FTC Commissioner Joshua Wright recently announced his retirement from the FTC Commission to go back to George Mason University School of Law. But he did not go out quietly. Not only was he incredibly productive during his FTC tenure, but he left right after the Federal Trade Commission issued “Principles…
Hospitals, Antitrust, the Department of Justice, and Agreements to Not Compete on Marketing
What is great about practicing antitrust law is that you take deep dives into the intricacies of different markets from the shelf space in drug stores for condoms—an actual case from several years ago—to insurance brokerage pricing to processed eggs and everything in between. There are, however, certain industries that…
Texas Federal Court Acts for Teladoc in Antitrust Case Against State Medical Board
It is easier to succeed in business without competition than with it. And if you are used to practicing your profession in a particular way, it is quite uncomfortable when new approaches develop that undercut your business. (As an aside, Aaron Gott and I just published an article for CIO…
My Analysis of the Supreme Court’s North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC Decision
If you haven’t yet heard, the Supreme Court upheld the FTC’s antitrust action against North Carolina’s state dental board. And I think they did a good job with the opinion. We wrote an amicus brief in this case and I have been studying these issues for years, so let me…
The Supreme Court Makes it Easier to Sue State Licensing Boards Under the Antitrust Laws
The US Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited decision today in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission. As you might recall, this case involved an antitrust challenge by the FTC against a state dental board made up of practicing dentists that took actions to exclude…
Takings and the Supreme Court’s Decision in Koontz v. St. Johns River Management District
If you read The Antitrust Attorney Blog regularly, you might have noticed that I think that the governments—federal, state, and local—tend to overreach into our business, our pursuits, and our lives. And I have strongly advocated that we apply the federal antitrust laws to counter the bloating influence of governments…
US Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Terminated Individual Case from MDL Proceeding
The US Supreme Court just issued its decision in an antitrust case called Ellen Gelboim v. Bank of America Corporation. This case arises out of major multi-district litigation (an MDL) centered on allegations that major banks conspired to manipulate the London InterBank Offered Rate (which you probably know as LIBOR)…
I Started The Antitrust Attorney Blog One Year Ago Today
One year ago, I wrote my first blog post for The Antitrust Attorney Blog. Time flies. A lot has changed since then. When I started this blog, I was with DLA Piper. Now I am with a firm called Bona Law PC. DLA Piper is much bigger, of course. But…